Key result
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation appears effective, reducing AF burden and promoting left atrial reverse remodelling.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation?
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights that CRT is effective in patients with HF and AF, reducing AF burden and promoting left atrial reverse remodelling.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents one of the most important comorbidities in patients with heart failure (HF). This report highlights the available evidence for the relationship between AF and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Studies on the use of CRT in patients with HF and AF have demonstrated its effectiveness. It seems to reduce the AF burden and determines left atrial reverse remodelling. No definite data are available on AF ablation in patients with CRT but it might represent a therapeutic option. Furthermore, modern implantable pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators are provided with diagnostic algorithms which allow a better understanding of the AF burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavalle et al. (2010) conducted a review in Heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) was evaluated. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation appears effective, reducing AF burden and promoting left atrial reverse remodelling.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: