Key result
Double 120-s cryoballoon PVI shows no benefit over single 240-s freeze for atrial tachyarrhythmia freedom.
Why the study?
Freezing-related complications in cryoballoon PVI tend to occur later during application, but long-term outcomes of a shorter double 120-s freeze protocol needed evaluation.
Does a modified double 120-s freeze protocol improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to a conventional single 240-s freeze protocol in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=160)
Does a modified double 120-s freeze protocol improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to a conventional single 240-s freeze protocol in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
A modified double 120-s cryoballoon freeze protocol provides similar long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to a standard 240-s protocol in patients with symptomatic AF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports comparable arrhythmia freedom with modified double-freeze protocol; leaves open randomized confirmation for cryoballoon PVI.
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Most centers use application durations of 180 or 240 s. Since freezing-related complications tend to occur later during the application, empirically shortening the duration may reduce procedural risks. A protocol using two consecutive 120-s freezes was proposed. Here, we report its long-term outcomes. METHODS: We performed a long-term follow-up comparison of patients with symptomatic AF undergoing PVI with second-generation CB between 2019 and 2020. The conventional single 240-s freeze protocol (CB240) was compared to a modified double 120-s freeze protocol (CB120). Among 160 consecutive patients, 80 received CB120 and 80 CB240. A total of 140 patients (70/group) completed follow-up. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia. RESULTS: Persistent AF was more common in the CB240 group (32%) than in the CB120 group (20%), (p < 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 948 ± 517 days, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year was 90% in the CB120 group and 82% in the CB240 group (log-rank p = 0.122). The primary outcome was assessed after a single procedure, including antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use. CONCLUSIONS: The CB120 protocol appears noninferior to the standard CB240 protocol regarding long-term efficacy, while offering a potentially more favorable safety profile. This protocol may represent a viable alternative for optimizing the balance between effectiveness and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbani et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=160). Modified double 120-s freeze protocol (CB120) vs. Conventional single 240-s freeze protocol (CB240) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (p=0.122). A modified double 120-s freeze protocol for cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation resulted in 90% freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year compared to 82% with a single 240-s freeze.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: