Key result
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators did not significantly affect overall health-related quality of life, though each shock reduced the mental component score by 1.0 ± 0.5 points (P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement affect health-related quality of life in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LVEF ≤35%?
Population
n=458 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, an ejection fraction of 35% or less, and either nonsustained…
Comparison
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs Standard medical therapy
Design
RCT, Randomized to an ICD or standard medical therapy
Follow-up
Throughout the trial
Authors
Loading...
Reassures on overall QoL with ICDs in nonischemic cardiomyopathy; extends DEFINITE mortality benefit without major QoL trade-off.
RCT (n=458)
Randomized
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement affect health-related quality of life in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LVEF ≤35%?
ICD implantation does not significantly affect overall health-related quality of life in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, though experiencing multiple shocks is associated with a decline in emotional and mental well-being.
Rod Passman (2007) conducted an RCT in Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=458). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs. Standard medical therapy was evaluated on Health-related quality of life (HRQL). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators did not significantly affect overall health-related quality of life, though each shock reduced the mental component score by 1.0 ± 0.5 points (P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: