Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 5, 2002CirculationOpen Access

Quality of Life in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators Trial

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does an implantable cardioverter defibrillator improve quality of life compared to antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias?

Population

800 patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias surviving 1 year in the AVID trial (n=384 AAD, n=416 ICD)

Comparison

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs Antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy

Design

RCT, randomized

Follow-up

1 year

Authors

ESEleanor SchronDEDerek V. ExnerQYQing Yao

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Similar QoL with ICD or AAD supports shared decisions on ventricular arrhythmia therapy; extends prior RCTs to patient-reported outcomes.

Structured PICO

Does an implantable cardioverter defibrillator improve quality of life compared to antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias?

P
Population
800 patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias surviving 1 year in the AVID trial (n=384 AAD, n=416 ICD)
I
Intervention
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
C
Comparator
Antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy
O
Outcome
Generic and disease-specific self-perceived quality of life (QoL) at 1 yearpatient reported

In survivors of serious ventricular arrhythmias, ICD and AAD therapies are associated with similar quality of life outcomes at 1 year, though device shocks and medication adverse symptoms negatively impact QoL.

Limitations

  • Only patients surviving 1 year were included in the primary analyses

Cite This Study

Schron et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cfbe695cf37b3666f76dchttps://doi.org/10.1161/hc0502.103330
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share