Examines heritage translation effects in museum metadata, highlighting cultural biases in classification systems.
Museum metadata is not a neutral record of cultural heritage but a site of cross-cultural translation where classification systems shape what is visible and what is silenced. This paper examines how Chinese cultural symbols are transformed through English-language metadata of four major museum collections totalling 40,072 artefact records. Constructing a co-occurrence network of 122 Chinese cultural symbols via a two-layer cross-lingual semantic matching pipeline, we measure heritage translation effects at scale. An epistemological filter privileging material over conceptual content is exposed most starkly in the near-total invisibility of ren (仁). The filter, grounded in classification asymmetry, operates through four mechanisms. The Translatability Fallacy—that more comprehensive metadata can close this gap—is challenged: greater semantic coverage reveals, rather than diminishes, the asymmetry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: