Key result
Adding remote technology to cardiac rehab shows no benefit over standard care for improving fitness.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the added value of the mcoach app and an activity bracelet in cardiac rehabilitation on changes in biopsychosocial functioning compared to rehabilitation without remote technology.
Does the addition of a mobile app and activity bracelet to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness, depressive symptoms, and social quality of life in coronary rehabilitees?
RCT (n=59)
Open-label
Cluster-randomized
No
Does the addition of a mobile app and activity bracelet to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness, depressive symptoms, and social quality of life in coronary rehabilitees?
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 0.69%
p-value: p=0.474
The addition of a mobile app and activity bracelet to standard 12-month cardiac rehabilitation did not provide added value in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, depressive symptoms, or social quality of life.
Purpose This study aimed to explore added value of mcoach app and activity bracelet in 12-month cardiac rehabilitation on changes in rehabilitee’s biopsychosocial functioning: cardiorespiratory fitness, depressive symptoms and social quality of life compared to similar rehabilitation without remote technology. Additionally, the study explored the factors explaining changes of biopsychosocial functioning. Materials and methods Six groups of coronary rehabilitees were cluster-randomised to experimental (n = 30) or control group (n = 29). Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses and linear regression analyses were used. Results No differences between the groups regarding changes in VO2max (p = 0.474), DEPS (p = 0.315) or social quality of life (p = 0.592) were observed. Positive changes in the whole study population in VO2max were explained with shorter time from last cardiac operation and higher light activity at the baseline (R2 = 0.309). Smaller increase in DEPS was explained with positive changes in different aspects of social quality of life (R2 = 0.562). Conclusions Remote technology had no added value for rehabilitation, but the results confirmed the importance of early rehabilitation, maintenance of socially meaningful life and the use of biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approaches. Research defining the needs and types of technology, their timing, to whom and to what extent the remote technology would be most beneficial, is still needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinkkonen et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=59). Remote technology (mCoach app and Fitbit Zip activity bracelet) plus standard cardiac rehabilitation vs. Standard cardiac rehabilitation without remote technology was evaluated on Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max in ml/kg/min) (p=0.474). Remote technology added to standard 12-month cardiac rehabilitation did not significantly improve cardiorespiratory fitness, depressive symptoms, or social quality of life compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: