Key result
Interdisciplinary rehabilitation is linked to a ~59% reduction in anxiety among long-term unemployed citizens.
Why the study?
This study aimed to describe health-related wellbeing among unemployed citizens with complex health or life issues, explore how stressful life events impact wellbeing, and understand how interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme activities affect development towards future employment.
Does an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program improve wellbeing and development towards future employment in long-term unemployed citizens?
Observational (n=146)
No
Does an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program improve wellbeing and development towards future employment in long-term unemployed citizens?
Absolute Event Rate: 27.4% vs 66.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Participation in an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program was associated with significant improvements in self-reported anxiety, depression, and loneliness among long-term unemployed citizens.
Associated with reduced anxiety in long-term unemployed; leaves open employment effects and needs RCTs.
Background Interdisciplinary rehabilitation programmes (IRP) are used in municipality settings to assist unemployed citizens with complex health and/or life issues. Individually tailored IRP activities help people develop their personal working life skills and increase their chances of re-entering the work force. The aims of this paper were to describe citizens’ wellbeing in terms of health aspects, explore the impact of stressful life events on wellbeing and obtain understanding of how IRP activities affect the participants’ development towards future employment. Methods A mixed methods exploratory approach has been used. For data collection a quantitative longitudinal survey (baseline and 1-year follow-up) and qualitative interviews were conducted. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of survey data, while the data material from interviews was analysed using directed content analysis. Results were discussed with the theory of flourishing as a framework to develop understanding. Results At baseline, 146 respondents (71% females) filled in the survey and seven participants were interviewed. The analysis of survey data and interviews revealed five themes: (1) Stressful life events, (2) Positive emotions - how IRP-activities positively impacted wellbeing and physical capacity, (3) Appreciation of engagement, (4) Relationships, and (5) Meaning and optimal functioning. Results showed that IRP participants from the outset experienced high general pain intensity as well as distress, anxiety and depression. Life events relating both to physical health and work life were significant for their wellbeing. IRP activities supported participants’ positive development towards future employment in ways that were specific to each individual. Conclusions From this study it can be derived that participants’ development took place around self-acceptance, acceptance by others, physical capacity, psychological resources and capacity to balance engagement to cultivate the best version of themselves. In future programmes, it may be emphasized that participants’ interest may be an important driver for wellbeing and future employment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02641704, date of registration December 29, 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Long-term unemployment with complex health and/or life issues (n=146). Interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme (IRP) vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Positive screening for anxiety (PHQ-4 anxiety subscale ≥3) (p=<0.001). Participation in an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program significantly reduced the proportion of long-term unemployed citizens experiencing anxiety from 66.4% at baseline to 27.4% at one-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: