Key result
CardioMEMS monitoring is linked to fewer HF hospitalizations in European observational data with standard safety.
Why the study?
Clinical evidence for the CardioMEMS system is mainly based upon U.S. studies, and structural differences in HF care between the U.S. and Europe necessitate evaluating its efficacy in a European setting.
Does CardioMEMS remote hemodynamic monitoring reduce heart failure hospitalizations in European patients with chronic heart failure?
Does CardioMEMS remote hemodynamic monitoring reduce heart failure hospitalizations in European patients with chronic heart failure?
This review highlights the promising observational efficacy and safety of the CardioMEMS system in Europe, while emphasizing the need for the upcoming MONITOR HF randomized trial to confirm its benefit on top of contemporary European standard care.
Supports CardioMEMS consideration in European HF; leaves open confirmation of benefit atop contemporary care by randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: HF System is a pulmonary artery pressure sensor developed for remote hemodynamic monitoring to reduce HF hospitalizations. The device is FDA approved and CE marked, but clinical evidence for the CardioMEMS system is mainly based upon U.S. studies. Because of structural differences in HF care between the U.S. and Europe, it is important to study CardioMEMS efficacy in European setting on top of usual HF care and contemporary therapy. Several observational studies have been performed in Europe, but there is an unmet need for randomized clinical trials. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on safety and efficacy data for CardioMEMS remote hemodynamic monitoring in European HF setting, and discusses important upcoming studies. EXPERT OPINION: For safety, data from European studies are in line with U.S. studies. Efficacy with regard to reduction of HF hospitalizations seems promising, but is merely based upon observational studies comparing pre- and post-implantation event rates. The first European randomized clinical trial (MONITOR HF) will provide efficacy data compared to actual standard care in a high-quality healthcare system with contemporary HF treatment and will provide important generalizable information to other European countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radhoe et al. (2023) conducted a review in chronic heart failure. CardioMEMS Heart Failure System vs. usual HF care was evaluated on HF hospitalizations. CardioMEMS remote hemodynamic monitoring shows promising efficacy for reducing heart failure hospitalizations in Europe based on observational data, with safety in line with U.S. studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: