Key result
LAA regional fibrosis predicts ~2% higher AF recurrence risk after MRI-guided ablation.
Why the study?
While the total amount of left atrial fibrosis predicts AF recurrence after catheter ablation, whether regional variations in left atrial fibrosis affect recurrence was unknown.
Does regional fibrosis percentage predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation?
RCT (n=734)
Randomized
Does regional fibrosis percentage predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation?
Effect estimate: OR 1.017
p-value: p=0.021
Regional fibrosis of the left atrial appendage is a significant predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in patients with persistent AF.
LAA regional fibrosis may stratify AF recurrence risk after ablation; leaves open whether targeted ablation improves outcomes in persistent AF.
AIMS: The amount of fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). We aim to identify whether regional variations in LA fibrosis affect AF recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: This post hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial includes 734 patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time CA who underwent late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) within 1 month prior to ablation and were randomized to MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to standard pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or standard PVI only. The LA wall was divided into seven regions: anterior, posterior, septal, lateral, right pulmonary vein (PV) antrum, left PV antrum, and left atrial appendage (LAA) ostium. Regional fibrosis percentage was defined as a region's fibrosis prior to ablation divided by total LA fibrosis. Regional surface area percentage was defined as an area's surface area divided by the total LA wall surface area before ablation. Patients were followed up for a year with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices. The left PV had the highest regional fibrosis percentage (29.30 ± 14.04%), followed by the lateral wall (23.23 ± 13.56%), and the posterior wall (19.80 ± 10.85%). The regional fibrosis percentage of the LAA was a significant predictor of AF recurrence post-ablation (odds ratio = 1.017, P = 0.021), and this finding was only preserved in patients receiving MRI-guided fibrosis ablation. Regional surface area percentages did not significantly affect the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: We have confirmed that atrial cardiomyopathy and remodelling are not a homogenous process, with variations in different regions of the LA. Atrial fibrosis does not uniformly affect the LA, and the left PV antral region has more fibrosis than the rest of the wall. Furthermore, we identified regional fibrosis of the LAA as a significant predictor of AF recurrence post-ablation in patients receiving MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to standard PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Assaf et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=734). MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to standard pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) vs. Standard PVI only was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation (OR 1.017, p=0.021). Regional fibrosis of the left atrial appendage was a significant predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation (OR 1.017, P=0.021) in patients receiving MRI-guided fibrosis ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: