Key result
Periaortic atrial fibrosis links to ~2% higher post-ablation AF recurrence risk per unit, unlike total fibrosis.
Why the study?
Left atrial fibrosis is not randomly distributed and is more frequent adjacent to the descending aorta, but the relationship with proximity and prognostic implications was unclear.
Does regional left atrial fibrosis adjacent to the descending aorta predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation in patients with AF?
Cohort (n=108)
Does regional left atrial fibrosis adjacent to the descending aorta predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation in patients with AF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.02 (95% CI 1.01–1.03)
p-value: p=0.01
Regional left atrial fibrosis adjacent to the descending aorta is a better predictor of AF recurrence after ablation than total atrial fibrosis.
AIMS: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis is present in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and can be visualized by magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE-MRI). Previous studies have shown that LA fibrosis is not randomly distributed, being more frequent in the area adjacent to the descending aorta (DAo). The objective of this study is to analyse the relationship between fibrosis in the atrial area adjacent to the DAo and the distance to it, as well as the prognostic implications of this fibrosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement was obtained in 108 patients before AF ablation to analyse the extent of LA fibrosis and the distance DAo-to-LA. A high-density electroanatomic map was performed in a subgroup of 16 patients to exclude the possibility of an MRI artifact. Recurrences after ablation were analysed at 1 year of follow-up. The extent of atrial fibrosis in the area adjacent to the DAo was inversely correlated with the distance DAo-to-LA (r = -0.34, P < 0.001). This area had the greatest intensity of LGE [image intensity ratio (IIR) 1.14 ± 0.15 vs. 0.99 ± 0.16; P < 0.001] and also the lowest voltage (1.07 ± 0.86 vs. 1.54 ± 1.07 mV; P < 0.001) and conduction velocity (0.65 ± 0.06 vs. 0.96 ± 0.57 mm/ms; P < 0.001). The extent of this regional fibrosis predicted recurrence after AF ablation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P = 0.01], however total fibrosis did not (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.06, P = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrosis was predominantly located in the area adjacent to the DAo, and increased with the proximity between the two structures. Furthermore, this regional fibrosis better predicted recurrence after AF ablation than total atrial fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caixal et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=108). Regional atrial fibrosis adjacent to the descending aorta vs. Total atrial fibrosis was evaluated on Recurrence after AF ablation (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p=0.01). Regional atrial fibrosis adjacent to the descending aorta predicted recurrence after AF ablation at 1 year (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P=0.01), whereas total atrial fibrosis did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: