Key result
Cryoballoon and hot balloon ablation show similar chronic cMRI lesion areas and AF recurrence rates.
Why the study?
Chronological changes in ablation lesions after cryoballoon ablation and hot balloon ablation of AF remain unclear.
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to hot balloon ablation improve chronic ablation lesion size and prevent AF recurrence in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=48)
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to hot balloon ablation improve chronic ablation lesion size and prevent AF recurrence in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 24.8% vs 21.1%
p-value: p=0.26
Although cryoballoon ablation creates larger acute lesions than hot balloon ablation, chronic lesion sizes and clinical AF recurrence rates are similar between the two modalities.
Similar chronic lesion sizes and AF recurrence suggest comparable durability; leaves open optimal balloon selection pending randomized trials.
Background: Chronological changes in ablation lesions after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and hot balloon ablation (HBA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. Methods: Of 90 patients who underwent initial balloon-based catheter ablation of AF and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) 3 months after ablation, data from 48 propensity score-matched patients (24 per group; 34 males; age 62±10 years) were analyzed. High-density pulmonary vein-left antrum (PV-LA) voltage mapping was performed after PV isolation, and low voltage areas around the PV ostia were defined as the total acute ablation lesion area (cm2). cMRI-derived dense fibrotic tissue localized around PVs was defined as the total chronic ablation lesion area (cm2). The percentage of total ablation lesion areas to total PV-LA surface area (%ablation lesion) was calculated during each phase, and %acute ablation lesion and %chronic ablation lesion areas were compared in patients who had undergone CBA and HBA. Results: The %acute ablation lesion area was larger for the CBA group than for the HBA group (30.8±5.8% vs. 23.0±5.5%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in %chronic cMRI-derived ablation lesion area (24.8±10.8% vs. 21.1±11.6%, p = 0.26) between groups. The rates of chronic AF recurrence were 12.5% and 8.3%, respectively (p = 0.45; log-rank test). LA volume and LA surface area were strongly associated with AF recurrence, but %chronic ablation lesion area was not (27±8% vs. 23±12%, p = 0.39). Conclusion: Large acute ablation lesions after CBA were smaller during the chronic phase. The size of chronic ablation lesions and the rate of AF recurrence were both similar for CBA and HBA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=48). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Hot balloon ablation was evaluated on %chronic cMRI-derived ablation lesion area (p=0.26). Cryoballoon ablation and hot balloon ablation resulted in similar chronic cMRI-derived ablation lesion areas (24.8% vs. 21.1%, p=0.26) and rates of AF recurrence (12.5% vs. 8.3%, p=0.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: