Key result
Epicardial ultrasound was applied to assess radial end-systolic strain across the cardiac wall in 5 anesthetised sheep before and after pericardial opening, though quantitative results were not reported.
Why the study?
Does pericardial opening affect radial end-systolic strain across the myocardial wall assessed by epicardial ultrasound in an open-chest sheep model?
Does pericardial opening affect radial end-systolic strain across the myocardial wall assessed by epicardial ultrasound in an open-chest sheep model?
Epicardial ultrasound can be used to assess transmural gradients in radial strain and evaluate the impact of pericardial opening on cardiac mechanics in a sheep model.
Feasibility of epicardial ultrasound for transmural radial strain shown in sheep; leaves open pericardial effects on mechanics.
Differences in radial deformation characteristics across the myocardial wall have been studied extensively in order to better understand cardiac mechanics and (patho-)physiology. To date, transmural gradients have typically been determined by invasive techniques as accurate non-invasive assessment remains a technical challenge. However, invasive methods require pericardial opening which is generally known to affect cardiac mechanics. The aim of this study was therefore to apply epicardial ultrasound in order to assess myocardial deformation at high temporal and spatial resolution. In this way, the differences in myocardial deformation across the wall could be quantified and the influence of pericardial opening could be studied. Hereto, five anesthetised, open-chest sheep were scanned using a 13 MHz epicardial transducer before and after pericardial opening. Color Doppler myocardial velocity data were acquired from the anterior wall with the probe positioned both parallel and perpendicular to the left anterior descending coronary artery. All data sets were analyzed off-line on a personal computer using dedicated software (SPEQLE). Radial end-systolic strain was extracted in the subendocardial, mid-wall and subepicardial layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’hooge et al. (2006) studied this question. Epicardial ultrasound vs. Before vs after pericardial opening was evaluated on Radial end-systolic strain in the subendocardial, mid-wall and subepicardial layers. Epicardial ultrasound was applied to assess radial end-systolic strain across the cardiac wall in 5 anesthetised sheep before and after pericardial opening, though quantitative results were not reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: