Key result
Heart rate variability threshold assessment during the incremental shuttle walk test is highly reliable (ICC 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-0.96) and valid for estimating ventilatory threshold in healthy adults.
Why the study?
Is heart rate variability threshold assessment during an incremental shuttle-walk test reliable and valid compared to ventilatory threshold in healthy middle-aged and older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
Is heart rate variability threshold assessment during an incremental shuttle-walk test reliable and valid compared to ventilatory threshold in healthy middle-aged and older adults?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.92 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.96)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.8% vs 4.8%
HRVT assessment during the incremental shuttle walk test is a reliable and valid method to estimate ventilatory threshold in middle-aged and older adults.
May support noninvasive ventilatory threshold estimation via HRVT in healthy adults; leaves open clinical adoption and prospective validation in patients.
Studies on the assessment of heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during walking are scarce. We determined the reliability and validity of HRVT assessment during the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) in healthy subjects. Thirty-one participants aged 57 ± 9 years (17 females) performed 3 ISWTs. During the 1st and 2nd ISWTs, instantaneous heart rate variability was calculated every 30 s and HRVT was measured. Walking velocity at HRVT in these tests (WV-HRVT1 and WV-HRVT2) was registered. During the 3rd ISWT, physiological responses were assessed. The ventilatory equivalents were used to determine ventilatory threshold (VT) and the WV at VT (WV-VT) was recorded. The difference between WV-HRVT1 and WV-HRVT2 was not statistically significant (median and interquartile range = 4.8; 4.8 to 5.4 vs 4.8; 4.2 to 5.4 km/h); the correlation between WV-HRVT1 and WV-HRVT2 was significant (r = 0.84); the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (0.92; 0.82 to 0.96), and the agreement was acceptable (-0.08 km/h; -0.92 to 0.87). The difference between WV-VT and WV-HRVT2 was not statistically significant (4.8; 4.8 to 5.4 vs 4.8; 4.2 to 5.4 km/h) and the agreement was acceptable (0.04 km/h; -1.28 to 1.36). HRVT assessment during walking is a reliable measure and permits the estimation of VT in adults. We suggest the use of the ISWT for the assessment of exercise capacity in middle-aged and older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dourado et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=31). Heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) assessment during incremental shuttle walk test vs. Ventilatory threshold (VT) was evaluated on Reliability of walking velocity at HRVT between two tests (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96). Heart rate variability threshold assessment during the incremental shuttle walk test is highly reliable (ICC 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-0.96) and valid for estimating ventilatory threshold in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: