Key result
Anaerobic threshold determined from heart rate variability (HFPOW-RSA) was highly correlated with blood lactate analysis (HR: r=0.93; velocity: r=0.98), providing an accurate testing tool in swimming.
Why the study?
Does heart rate variability accurately estimate the anaerobic threshold compared to blood lactate concentration in high-level swimmers?
Observational (n=14)
Does heart rate variability accurately estimate the anaerobic threshold compared to blood lactate concentration in high-level swimmers?
Effect estimate: r = 0.93 (HR), r = 0.98 (velocity) (95% CI LoA: -6.7 to 4.9 b·min (HR); -0.05 to 0.05 m·s (velocity))
p-value: p=> 0.05
Heart rate variability, specifically the fraction of high-frequency spectral power relative to respiratory sinus arrhythmia, provides an accurate estimate of the anaerobic threshold in swimmers compared to blood lactate testing.
Supports noninvasive anaerobic threshold testing in swimmers; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
This study aimed to evaluate, in swimming, the agreement between the anaerobic threshold (AT) as determined from the analysis of blood lactate concentration ([La]) and from a new method based on the heart rate (HR) variability (HRV). Fourteen high-level swimmers completed an incremental 7 × 200-m front crawl test, during which the HRV was measured continuously and [La] was collected after each step. To individuate the AT, the trends of the high-frequency HRV spectral power (HFPOW) and of the fraction of HFPOW relative to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (HFPOW-RSA) were analyzed. In all the subjects, an abrupt increase of both HFPOW and HFPOW-RSA was observed and associated with the AT. The AT parameters determined, respectively, from [La] and HFPOW-RSA were similar (p > 0.05) and highly correlated (HR: 182.0 ± 8.1 vs. 181.1 ± 8.2 b·min, r = 0.93, 95% limits of agreement [LoA]: -6.7 to 4.9 b·min; velocity: 1.47 ± 0.11 vs. 1.47 ± 0.11 m·s, r = 0.98, 95% LoA: -0.05 to 0.05 m·s). Instead, the AT HR and velocity obtained from HFPOW (179.2 ± 8.4 b·min; 1.45 ± 0.11 m·s) were correlated to the corresponding parameters determined from [La] (HR: r = 0.84; velocity: r = 0.94) but underestimated them slightly (95% LoA: -11.9 to 6.3 b·min and -0.11 to 0.05 m·s). These results demonstrate that the AT can be assessed from the HRV in swimming, providing an important testing tool for coaches. Furthermore, using the actual respiratory spectral component, rather than the total HF spectral power, allows us to obtain a more accurate estimate of AT parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michele et al. (2011) conducted an observational in High-level swimmers (n=14). Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis (HFPOW-RSA) vs. Blood lactate concentration ([La]) analysis was evaluated on Agreement between anaerobic threshold (AT) determined from [La] and HFPOW-RSA (r = 0.93 (HR), r = 0.98 (velocity), 95% CI LoA: -6.7 to 4.9 b·min (HR); -0.05 to 0.05 m·s (velocity), p=> 0.05). Anaerobic threshold determined from heart rate variability (HFPOW-RSA) was highly correlated with blood lactate analysis (HR: r=0.93; velocity: r=0.98), providing an accurate testing tool in swimming.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: