Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants in solid organ transplant recipients require careful evaluation of risks and benefits due to drug interactions, organ impairment, and perioperative management needs.
Why the study?
What are the pharmacological properties, dosing considerations, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management strategies for DOAC use in solid organ transplant recipients?
What are the pharmacological properties, dosing considerations, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management strategies for DOAC use in solid organ transplant recipients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the need for careful evaluation of DOAC risks and benefits in solid organ transplant recipients, particularly regarding drug interactions and organ function.
For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter- and intrapatient variability, much shorter half-lives, and less known drug-drug and drug-food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salerno et al. (2016) conducted a review in Solid organ transplantation requiring anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants in solid organ transplant recipients require careful evaluation of risks and benefits due to drug interactions, organ impairment, and perioperative management needs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: