Why the study?
The safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients after solid organ transplantation was not well defined.
Are direct oral anticoagulants safe and effective in patients after solid organ transplantation on maintenance immunosuppression?
Are direct oral anticoagulants safe and effective in patients after solid organ transplantation on maintenance immunosuppression?
DOACs appear safe and effective in solid organ transplant recipients, though immunosuppressive trough levels may increase and require monitoring, particularly early after initiation.
DOAC use after SOT remains poorly characterized; this cohort study leaves open the need for randomized safety data.
The safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is not well defined. This study aimed at describing the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients after SOT. Patients after kidney and/or liver transplantation under maintenance immunosuppression treated with rivaroxaban (n = 26), apixaban (n = 20) and edoxaban (n = 1) were included. Clinical data were collected retrospectively and using a questionnaire. DOAC plasma levels and thrombin generation (TG) were measured in patients after SOT and compared with nontransplanted controls receiving DOACs. DOACs were administered for 84.6 patient-years. Mean immunosuppressive trough levels after DOAC initiation increased from baseline by 18.8 ± 29.6% compared to 3.0 ± 16.5% in matched controls (P = 0.004), without significant differences in dose adjustments. No transplant rejection or significant change in liver or renal function was observed. There was one major bleeding after the observation period but no thromboembolic complication. DOAC plasma levels reached the expected range in all patients. The intrinsic hemostatic activity in transplanted patients was higher compared to nontransplant controls. Treatment with DOACs after SOT is safe and effective. Immunosuppressive trough levels should be monitored after DOAC initiation, particularly in the early phase after SOT. These data should be confirmed in a prospective study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfrepper et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: