Why the study?
The comparative safety and efficacy of DOACs against warfarin had not been well studied in kidney transplant recipients despite their increased use.
Do direct-acting oral anticoagulants reduce major bleeding compared to warfarin in adult kidney transplant recipients?
Do direct-acting oral anticoagulants reduce major bleeding compared to warfarin in adult kidney transplant recipients?
In adult kidney transplant recipients, DOACs appear to have a similar safety profile to warfarin regarding major bleeding, with apixaban potentially offering a lower bleeding risk.
Supports comparable major bleeding safety of DOACs versus warfarin in kidney transplant recipients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Despite the increased use, comparative safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) against warfarin have not been well studied in kidney transplant recipients. In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated 197 adult kidney transplant recipients on DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2018. The primary outcome was incidence of major bleeding defined as a hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dl, blood transfusion ≥2 units, or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ. Patients were initiated on anticoagulation therapy at a median of 6.5 years post-transplant and followed for a median of 12.3 months. The rates of major bleeding were 7.2% per year with DOACs vs. 11.4% per year with warfarin (Mantel-Cox P = 0.15). No difference was found in composite bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or thromboembolic events between the groups. There was a lower incidence of major bleeding with apixaban compared to all other anticoagulants (6.7% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.027). After controlling for potential confounders, DOAC use was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.27-1.95). Further research is warranted to definitively determine whether DOACs are effective and safe alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in kidney transplant recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bixby et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: