Carbon taxes are frequently proposed as a means to mitigate the hydrocarbon industry's environmental impact. This paper assesses the potential benefits of an alternative to carbon taxes (ACT), where hydrocarbon producers directly invest a fixed amount per unit produced into renewable energy systems (e.g., wind farms). Producers maintain ownership of the assets and reinvest a portion of revenue from them to further grow the renewable assets. This proposal could help producers gradually evolve from hydrocarbon to renewable energy companies – avoiding the job losses associated with sudden industry shifts. We present an in-depth case study of the Athabasca oil sands, and extend the results to other regions. We find that wind turbines purchased with an ACT of 12/barrel where 0.03/kWh of produced power is reinvested could offset all the greenhouse gas emissions from extracting and refining the region's bitumen, provided wind turbines were located at good wind sites. Finally, to increase the grid's ability to use the wind power generated, energy storage and grid systems should also be an option for ACT investing. Future work should focus on North Dakota, which has extensive hydrocarbon resources collocated with good wind resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: