What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the physiological nature and clinical response of post-myocardial infarction shock syndrome to empirical therapy.

April 4, 1953Journal of the American Medical Association

Clinical Study of Shock Following Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

15 cases of shock syndrome following acute myocardial infarction seen in 1949 and 1950

Design

Case_series

Authors

TFTheodore R. FinkHadassah Academic College CDCarl J. d'Angio SBSol BiloonMorris College

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Historical case series of post-MI shock; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Key Points

To evaluate the physiological nature and clinical response of post-myocardial infarction shock syndrome to empirical therapy.
Conducted a clinical investigation of 15 patients presenting with shock following acute myocardial infarction between 1949 and 1950.
Administered empirical medical therapy tailored to bedside clinical and hemodynamic findings.
Demonstrated that shock following acute myocardial infarction involves complex circulatory failure distinct from classical traumatic shock.
Identified differing hemodynamic responses to supportive measures, reflecting variations between primary pump failure and peripheral vascular tone.

Structured PICO

Population

15 cases of shock syndrome following acute myocardial infarction seen in 1949 and 1950

Intervention

Empirical therapy based on clinical findings

Outcome

Response to empirical therapy

A historical case series of 15 patients with shock following acute myocardial infarction treated empirically to clarify the nature of the syndrome.

Cite This Study

Fink et al. (1953) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1551aa5347fbb1739f95f2 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1953.02940140007003

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

April 4, 1953Journal of the American Medical Association

Clinical Study of Shock Following Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

15 cases of shock syndrome following acute myocardial infarction seen in 1949 and 1950

Design

Case_series

Authors

TFTheodore R. FinkHadassah Academic College CDCarl J. d'Angio SBSol BiloonMorris College

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Historical case series of post-MI shock; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Key Points

To evaluate the physiological nature and clinical response of post-myocardial infarction shock syndrome to empirical therapy.
Conducted a clinical investigation of 15 patients presenting with shock following acute myocardial infarction between 1949 and 1950.
Administered empirical medical therapy tailored to bedside clinical and hemodynamic findings.
Demonstrated that shock following acute myocardial infarction involves complex circulatory failure distinct from classical traumatic shock.
Identified differing hemodynamic responses to supportive measures, reflecting variations between primary pump failure and peripheral vascular tone.

Structured PICO

Population

15 cases of shock syndrome following acute myocardial infarction seen in 1949 and 1950

Intervention

Empirical therapy based on clinical findings

Outcome

Response to empirical therapy

A historical case series of 15 patients with shock following acute myocardial infarction treated empirically to clarify the nature of the syndrome.

Cite This Study

Fink et al. (1953) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1551aa5347fbb1739f95f2 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1953.02940140007003

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark