PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2018Minerva Cardioangiologica7 citations

Impella-protected PCI: the clinical results achieved so far

View Full Paper
GPGabriele PesariniAGAndrea GrattaGDGiulia Dolci

Key Result

Impella percutaneous axial pump support during high-risk PCI demonstrates safety and feasibility, with early support potentially improving patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock.

Structured PICO

Does Impella percutaneous axial pump support improve outcomes in high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock patients?

P
Population
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients and patients with cardiogenic shock
I
Intervention
Impella percutaneous axial pump

While RCT evidence is limited, observational data suggests Impella is safe and feasible for high-risk PCI and may improve outcomes when used early in cardiogenic shock.

Limitations

  • The largest RCT (PROTECT II) was prematurely stopped due to the risk of futility
  • Need for an adequate operator's learning curve

Abstract

The ability of interventional cardiologists to identify high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients, requires the integration of different features belonging to medical history, organ damage, coronary anatomy and the nature of the acute event. The selection of a subgroup of patients that could benefit from mechanical support during interventions is a key feature to success. The introduction of the Impella percutaneous axial pump have added an easy-to-set-up, less invasive and time-consuming active-support device to the interventional toolbox. Up to date, only few (four) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tried to address the clinical efficacy of Impella assistance for the treatment of this very high-risk population, but several large registries and multiple observational studies have demonstrated its safety, feasibility and hemodynamic performance. Although the largest RCT (PROTECT II) have been prematurely stopped due to the risk of futility despite the evidence of more complete revascularization in the Impella arm, the need for an adequate operator's learning curve must be considered. More recent insights suggest an effect of the device in optimizing end-organ perfusion and improving crucial parameters like renal function. Furthermore, available data suggest that vary early Impella support may improve patient's outcome in case of cardiogenic shock.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pesarini et al. (2018) conducted a review in High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiogenic shock. Impella percutaneous axial pump was evaluated. Impella percutaneous axial pump support during high-risk PCI demonstrates safety and feasibility, with early support potentially improving patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1553a49b87f33fc69f7374https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4725.18.04678-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2012 · 866 citations
  2. 2Trends in Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock2005 · 668 citations
  3. 3Safety and Feasibility of Elective High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures With Left Ventricular Support of the Impella Recover LP 2.52006 · 223 citations
  4. 4Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study2014 · 43 citations
  5. 5Comparison of Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: Vascular complications and incidence of bleeding2012 · 29 citations