Key result
Impella 2.5 support during urgent PCI in 10 patients with advanced heart failure or cardiogenic shock resulted in 100% successful implantation and a 1-month mortality rate of 20%.
Why the study?
Does Impella 2.5 support provide hemodynamic stability in patients with advanced heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock undergoing urgent high-risk PCI?
Observational (n=10)
Does Impella 2.5 support provide hemodynamic stability in patients with advanced heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock undergoing urgent high-risk PCI?
Impella 2.5 may provide effective hemodynamic support during urgent high-risk PCI in patients with advanced heart failure or cardiogenic shock, though mortality remains high in this extremely sick population.
Impella 2.5 feasible in small high-risk PCI series; leaves open mortality benefit in cardiogenic shock.
PROTECT I and II trials have tested the efficacy of Impella in patents with high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, patients with severe hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest, ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of Impella in sicker patient population who were not included in PROTECT trials. These patients merit high-risk PCI who had cardiogenic shock and unstable or decompensated heart failure (HF). From December 2010 to March 2012, 10 consecutive patients with extremely high surgical risk and hemodynamic instability underwent urgent PCI with Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA). These patients were presented with advance HF and/or cardiogenic shock. Among the 10 included patients, 3 patients were with cardiac arrest and 1 patient was with acute myocardial infarction. All patients had successful Impella implantation and remained hemodynamically stable during high-risk PCI. Among the 10 patients 2 patients (20%) died within 1 month and 1 patient developed limb ischemia. In high-risk population nonrandomizable to PROTECT trials with advance HF/cardiogenic shock, Impella could be an important tool for hemodynamic support to PCI or could be a bridge to left ventricle assist device to achieve good recovery. Larger studies need to be conducted on this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Advanced heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock (n=10). Impella 2.5 was evaluated on 1-month mortality. Impella 2.5 support during urgent PCI in 10 patients with advanced heart failure or cardiogenic shock resulted in 100% successful implantation and a 1-month mortality rate of 20%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: