Key result
Provided text lacks clinical data to determine DOAC efficacy for VTE prevention after cancer surgery.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism risk is high after cancer surgery and reduced by antithrombotic prophylaxis, motivating evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism after cancer-related surgery compared to LMWH or placebo?
Meta-Analysis
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism after cancer-related surgery compared to LMWH or placebo?
DOACs, particularly apixaban, appear to be effective and safe alternatives to LMWH for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following cancer-related surgery.
Lacks usable data to assess DOAC efficacy for post-cancer surgery VTE prevention; leaves open need for dedicated trials.
The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is high after cancer surgery and is reduced by antithrombotic prophylaxis.We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for VTE prophylaxis after cancer surgery. The primary study outcome was 30-day VTE after surgery. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs; two gynecological, one abdominal, one neurosurgical, and one thoracic; 1,694 patients) and seven observational studies (three urological, two abdominal, and two gynecological; 2,042 patients) were included. DOACs reduced the incidence of 30-day (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.98, I2 22.7%) and 90-day VTE (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92, I2 0%) compared to LMWH. No difference was observed between DOACs and LMWH in 30 and 90-day bleeding outcomes. In random effect analyses, apixaban (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.84) and not rivaroxaban reduced the risk of 30 day-VTE compared to LMWH (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.35-1.34) without increasing the risk of bleeding at 30 or 90 days. No difference in the risk of VTE or bleeding was observed between DOACs and placebo/no treatment, but these analyses were probably underpowered. Subgroup analyses were conducted on LMWH pre-treatment, extended prophylaxis, duration of surgery, and type of surgery.Our study supports apixaban and rivaroxaban as promising alternatives to LMWH in post-operative prophylaxis of VTE after cancer surgery. Further high-quality data are needed in specific surgical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pititto et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Venous Thromboembolism after Cancer-Related Surgery. Direct Oral Anticoagulants was evaluated. The provided text contains only journal masthead information and lacks the clinical data necessary to determine the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants for VTE prevention after cancer surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: