A community-based skill-building intervention for heart failure self-care was feasible and acceptable based on preliminary data from 60 participants.
RCT (n=75)
Staggered
Yes
Does a community-based skill-building intervention improve self-care, knowledge, and quality of life in older adults with heart failure?
A community-based, group skill-building intervention for heart failure self-care appears feasible and acceptable among older, ethnically diverse adults.
BACKGROUND: Self-care is the cornerstone of heart failure (HF) management. Numerous approaches to improving HF self-care, which involves adherence to the treatment plan, routine symptom monitoring, and the response to symptoms when they occur, have been developed with little impact on HF outcomes. On the basis of HF practice recommendations that patients receive education and counseling that emphasizes self-care and targets skill building of critical target behaviors, we are conducting a clinical trial designed to improve self-care among community-dwelling older adults using an innovative group-based, skill-building approach led by a trained health educator. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the study design and research methods used to implement and evaluate the intervention. METHODS: The study uses a staggered randomized controlled design to assess feasibility of providing an HF self-care intervention in a community group setting to improve HF self-care, knowledge, and health-related quality of life at 1 and 3 months. A community engagement approach is used to partner with the community throughout all phases of the project. Seventy-five older adults with HF are randomly assigned to the intervention consisting of six to eight 60-minute sessions held in community senior centers or to the wait-list control group. Focus groups are used to elicit feedback on the participants' experience in the program. RESULTS: Preliminary study participation data (n=60; women, 48%; black, 27%; Hispanic, 32%; mean SD age, 70 10 years) and focus group feedback suggest that the delivery approach is feasible and acceptable, and the participants are very satisfied with the program. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a community-based HF self-care intervention delivered in partnership with established community-based centers is an innovative approach to intervention. If efficacy is demonstrated, this intervention has far-reaching implications for helping the growing population of HF patients in ethnically diverse communities.
Dickson et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Heart failure (n=75). Community-based skill-building intervention vs. Wait-list control group was evaluated on Feasibility, HF self-care, knowledge, and health-related quality of life. A community-based skill-building intervention for heart failure self-care was feasible and acceptable based on preliminary data from 60 participants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: