Key result
Echocardiography in 14 children with moderate or severe pulmonic stenosis revealed an increased 'a' wave depth (>6 mm in 12 patients, average 10 mm) due to premature pulmonary valve opening.
Why the study?
What are the echocardiographic characteristics of pulmonary valve motion in children with valvular pulmonary stenosis?
Observational (n=16)
What are the echocardiographic characteristics of pulmonary valve motion in children with valvular pulmonary stenosis?
Echocardiography in children with moderate to severe pulmonary stenosis demonstrates an exaggerated 'a' wave depth (>6 mm) due to premature pulmonary valve opening.
May aid noninvasive pulmonic stenosis assessment in children; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Echocardiography tracings of the pulmonary valve was recorded in 16 patients with pulmonic stenosis (PS) ranging in ages from 6 to 14 years (average 10 years). 11 patients had an isolated PS and 5 had a PS associated with atrial septal defect. In 2 patients with mild PS (gradient 15 mm Hg) the depth of the "a" wave was normal: 3 and 4 mm. In 14 patients with moderate or severe PS (gradient 40 mm to 200 mm Hg), the maximal depth of the "a" wave was less than 6 mm in 2 patients, and more than 6 mm in 12 patients (range 7 to 15 mm, average 10 mm). The motion of both anterior and posterior pulmonary valve leaflets was well recorded in 3 patients with severe PS. The "a" wave showed a posterior motion of the posterior leaflets and an anterior motion of the anterior leaflet. This motion is due to the premature pulmonary valve opening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rey et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Pulmonic stenosis (n=16). Echocardiography was evaluated on Depth of the 'a' wave on echocardiography. Echocardiography in 14 children with moderate or severe pulmonic stenosis revealed an increased 'a' wave depth (>6 mm in 12 patients, average 10 mm) due to premature pulmonary valve opening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: