Key result
High-intensity interval training improves VO2peak in all patients after ~10 sessions.
Why the study?
To investigate intra- and interindividual physiological adaptation to high-intensity interval training by comparing single and duplicate pre- to posttesting with session-by-session analysis to more accurately identify genuine adaptations.
Does continuous session-by-session monitoring during high-intensity interval training improve the detection of genuine physiological adaptations compared to pre- to posttesting?
Does continuous session-by-session monitoring during high-intensity interval training improve the detection of genuine physiological adaptations compared to pre- to posttesting?
Continuous session-by-session monitoring of peak oxygen uptake during high-intensity interval training more accurately identifies genuine physiological adaptations and minimizes false responder rates compared to traditional pre- to posttesting.
May support continuous monitoring to reduce responder misclassification in HIIT; leaves open clinical adoption pending randomized trials.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the intra- and interindividual time courses of physiological adaptation to high-intensity interval training, comparing single and duplicate pre- to posttesting with session-by-session analysis to more accurately identify "genuine" adaptations. METHODS: Seventeen participants (nine men) engaged in repeated 4 × 4 min high-intensity interval training sessions (2 times per week) until a meaningful change in the primary outcome, i.e., relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ), was observed. RESULTS: Mixed-effects model analysis revealed a significant improvement for V̇O 2peak for both session-by-session (estimate: 0.18, P < 0.01, d = 0.11) analysis and duplicate pre- to postanalysis (estimate: 3.97, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36). Session-by-session analysis revealed significant variability in physiological responses, with a low coefficient of variation (CV) for V̇O 2peak (3.49% + 1.96%) and estimated maximum stroke volume (SV max ) (3.07% ± 1.92%), and indicating their reliability for detecting small changes. With a CV of 22.14% ± 13.80%, submaximal blood lactate ([BLa] submax ) was the least reliable parameter. With session-by-session analysis, V̇O 2peak was the only parameter displaying 100% positive responders after 9.5 ± 3.8 sessions. Additionally, session-by-session analysis revealed lower proportions of participants with positive adaptations for submaximal V̇O 2 and SV max but higher proportions for submaximal respiratory exchange ratio and rating of perceived exertion compared with pre- to postanalysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of longitudinal assessments for understanding the variability and dynamics of training adaptations. By addressing the limitations of pre- to postevaluations, the findings emphasize the importance of frequent monitoring to accurately capture individual responses, thereby advancing strategies for optimizing exercise interventions across diverse populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matzka et al. (2025) studied this question. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Pre- to posttesting was evaluated on relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak) (estimate 0.18, p=< 0.01). Session-by-session analysis of high-intensity interval training detected significant improvements in VO2peak (estimate 0.18, P<0.01) and identified 100% positive responders after 9.5 ± 3.8 sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: