Key result
Automated LAP via MR spectrum shows a strong ~0.91 correlation with invasive catheter measurements.
Why the study?
The authors sought to explore how to accurately and quantitatively measure left atrial pressure using the equation method from the mitral regurgitation spectrum.
Does non-invasive measurement of left atrial pressure using the equation method based on mitral regurgitation spectrum accurately correlate with invasive floating catheter measurement in patients with mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=28)
Single-blind
No
Does non-invasive measurement of left atrial pressure using the equation method based on mitral regurgitation spectrum accurately correlate with invasive floating catheter measurement in patients with mitral regurgitation?
Non-invasive quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure using the equation method based on mitral regurgitation spectrum is feasible and correlates well with invasive catheter measurements.
Introduction To explore how to measure LAP Eq accurately and quantitatively, that is, the left atrial pressure (LAP) measured and calculated by equation method using mitral regurgitation spectrum. Methods The mitral regurgitation spectrum, pulmonary arteriolar wedge pressure (PAWP) and invasive arterial systolic pressure of radial artery of 28 patients were collected simultaneously, including 3 patients with rheumatic heart disease, 15 patients with mitral valve prolapse and 10 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, patients with moderate or above aortic stenosis were excluded. LAP Bp (Doppler sphygmomanometer method), LAP Eq (Equation method) and LAP C (Catheter method) were measured synchronously, and the measurement results of the three methods were compared and analyzed. A special intelligent Doppler spectrum analysis software was self-designed to accurately measure LAP Eq . This study had been approved by the ethics committee of the Northern Theater General Hospital (K-2019-17), and applied for clinical trial (No. Chictr 190023812). Results It was found that there was no significant statistical difference between the measurement results of LAP C and LAP Eq ( t = 0.954, P = 0.348), and significant correlation between the two methods [ r = 0.908(0.844, 0.964), P < 0.001]. Although the measurement results of LAP C and LAP BP are consistent in the condition of non-severe eccentric mitral regurgitation, there are significant differences in the overall case and weak correlation between the two methods [ r = 0.210, (−0.101, 0.510), P = 0.090]. In MVP patients with P1 or P3 prolapse, the peak pressure difference of MR was underestimated due to the serious eccentricity of MR, which affected the accuracy of LAP BP measurement. Conclusions It was shown that there is a good correlation between LAP Eq and LAP C , which verifies that the non-invasive and direct quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure based on mitral regurgitation spectrum is feasible and has a good application prospect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation requiring cardiac surgery (n=28). LAPEq (Equation method using mitral regurgitation spectrum) vs. LAPC (Catheter method / PAWP) was evaluated on Correlation between LAPEq and LAPC measurements (r = 0.908, 95% CI 0.844, 0.964, p=<0.001). The automatic quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure using the mitral regurgitation spectrum (LAPEq) showed a strong correlation (r = 0.908) with invasive catheter measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: