Key result
LVEF-based HF guidelines fail to address multisystemic disease complexity and require conceptual revision.
Why the study?
Current guidelines rely on LVEF for evaluation, risk stratification, and management despite its limitations, prompting consideration of whether heart failure concepts require revision to reflect clinical complexity.
The authors argue that current heart failure guidelines over-rely on LVEF and should be revised to reflect the multisystemic nature of the disease.
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome defined by specific symptoms and signs due to structural and/or functional heart abnormalities, which lead to inadequate cardiac output and/or increased intraventricular filling pressure. Importantly, HF becomes progressively a multisystemic disease. However, in August 2021, the European Society of Cardiology published the new Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic HF, according to which the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) continues to represent the pivotal parameter for HF patients' evaluation, risk stratification and therapeutic management despite its limitations are well known. Indeed, HF has a complex pathophysiology because it first involves the heart, progressively becoming a multisystemic disease, leading to multiorgan failure and death. In these terms, HF is comparable to cancer. As for cancer, surviving, morbidity and hospitalisation are related not only to the primary neoplastic mass but mainly to the metastatic involvement. In HF, multiorgan involvement has a great impact on prognosis, and multiorgan protective therapies are equally important as conventional cardioprotective therapies. In the light of these considerations, a revision of the HF concept is needed, starting from its definition up to its therapy, to overcome the old and simplistic HF perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Severino et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Current heart failure guidelines relying on left ventricular ejection fraction are inadequate for addressing the complex, multisystemic nature of the disease, necessitating a conceptual revision.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: