Key result
Inclisiran lowers LDL-C ~44% more than oral nonstatins with efficacy comparable to PCSK9 antibodies.
Why the study?
Do nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies differ in their ability to reduce LDL-C in patients with ASCVD and/or high cardiovascular risk on maximally tolerated statins?
Meta-Analysis
Do nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies differ in their ability to reduce LDL-C in patients with ASCVD and/or high cardiovascular risk on maximally tolerated statins?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an updated network meta-analysis, inclisiran demonstrated superior LDL-C reduction compared to ezetimibe and bempedoic acid, and comparable efficacy to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in high-risk patients on maximally tolerated statins.
Hypercholesterolemia is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) such as ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bempedoic acid, and inclisiran have been recommended in clinical guidelines to treat patients with ASCVD and/or high cardiovascular (CV) risk having elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite being treated with maximally tolerated doses (MTD) of statins. Our previously published network meta-analysis (NMA) 1 was updated in this study to evaluate comparative efficacy of nonstatin LLTs in reducing LDL-C among patients with ASCVD and/or high CV risk receiving MTD statins. The systematic literature review previously conducted to inform our NMA was updated through January 2023, wherein more recent clinical trials of nonstatin LLTs (ORION-15, ORION-18, and HUA TUO) and additional data on monthly dosing regimens for PCSK9 mAbs were included. The outcome of interest was percentage change in LDL-C at week 24. Random-effects Bayesian NMA was performed. Comparative efficacy was estimated as mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). A total of 20 trials were deemed relevant for the NMA. Consistent with the previous findings from our NMA, this study demonstrated that inclisiran provided superior efficacy in LDL-C lowering compared with ezetimibe and bempedoic acid (MD: -44.24 [95% CrI: -51.84 to -36.70]). This NMA further reaffirmed that inclisiran provided comparable LDL-C reduction versus alirocumab (MD: -1.93% [95% CrI: -8.56 to 4.20]) and evolocumab (MD: 2.00% [95% CrI: -4.58 to 8.60]) among patients with ASCVD and/or high CV risk on MTD statins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burnett et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypercholesterolemia. Inclisiran vs. Ezetimibe and bempedoic acid was evaluated on Percentage change in LDL-C at week 24 (MD -44.24, 95% CI -51.84 to -36.70).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: