Key result
Healthy women show ~2% greater absolute RVFWLS than men.
Why the study?
To promote the implementation of right ventricular longitudinal strain in clinical practice by proposing normal values for RV free wall and four-chamber longitudinal strain and investigating associations with clinical and echocardiographic parameters.
What are the normal age- and sex-based values of right ventricular free wall and four-chamber longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the general population?
Population
2951 participants from the general population in the 5th Copenhagen City Heart Study
Design
Prospective cohort study
Authors
Loading...
May support sex-specific RV strain norms in echo reporting; leaves open validation for risk stratification.
Cohort (n=2,951)
No
What are the normal age- and sex-based values of right ventricular free wall and four-chamber longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the general population?
Absolute Event Rate: -27.5% vs -25.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
This study establishes normal age- and sex-based reference values for right ventricular longitudinal strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography, highlighting significant sex differences.
Espersen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Healthy general population (n=2,951). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) (p=<0.001). In a healthy general population sample, women had significantly higher absolute values of right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain compared to men (-27.5% vs. -25.4%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: