Key result
Various strategies to protect the esophagus during atrial fibrillation ablation, including temperature probes and alternative energy sources, are not infallible in completely attenuating vulnerability.
Highlights the ongoing challenge and vulnerability of the esophagus to thermal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation despite various protective strategies.
atrial fibrillation, ablation Collateral damage to esophagus with ablative therapies for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major concern with percutaneous catheter based therapies.Endoscopically documented thermal injuries to the esophageal mucosa such as ulcerations or hemorrhages are seen in a significant percentage of patients undergoing AF ablation.[1,2] The reporting of occurrence of a fatal left atrio-oesophageal fistula (LAEF) with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in 2004, led to an explosion of innovations and strategies to protect the esophagus during transmural posterior left atrial lesions.The use of low energy lesions in the posterior wall, introduction of a temperature probe in the esophagus, use of proton pump inhibitors, pre and intra procedure imaging and alternative sources of ablation have all contributed to this endeavor.Clinical applications of each of these strategies have shown that none of them are infallible in completely attenuating the vulnerability of esophagus during pulmonary vein isolation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. Hygriv Rao (2012) conducted an editorial in Atrial fibrillation. Esophageal protection strategies during ablation was evaluated. Various strategies to protect the esophagus during atrial fibrillation ablation, including temperature probes and alternative energy sources, are not infallible in completely attenuating vulnerability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: