Key result
Supine HRV monitoring reveals decreased parasympathetic activity during intense training to guide optimized athlete prescription.
Why the study?
The study investigated whether variation in parasympathetic branch activity combined with subjective data could optimize training prescription for an elite athlete during an Olympic season.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Heart Rate Variability combined with subjective markers can be used to monitor psychophysiological stress and adapt training periods in elite athletes.
HRV monitoring may aid individualized training in elite athletes; leaves open generalizability beyond this single case.
Purpose: The aim of this case study was to investigate whether the variation in parasympathetic branch activity, in conjunction with subjective data, could optimize the training prescription for an elite athlete during an Olympic season. Methods: During the preparatory phase for the Tokyo Olympic Games, a world-class female 3000m steeplechase runner (Age: 20 years, Height: 168 cm, Weight: 52 kg, VO2max: 67.1 mL⋅min⋅kg-1) recorded Heart Rate Variability (HRV), conducted orthostatic tests, and completed subjective evaluations four times a week throughout the different training periods that constitute a pre-Olympic season. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the Shapiro-Wilk test, along with paired T-tests, were used to assess correlations and compare mean differences between variables concerning baseline measurements and each of the other training periods. Results: The natural logarithm of the root mean square of the standard deviation during supine measurement (LnRMSSDsu) exhibited a significant negative correlation with the training load based on Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and sleep quality (P < 0.05). Heart rate during supine measurement (HRsu) showed a significant positive correlation with subjective perceived exertion, sleep quality, stress, muscle soreness, and fatigue (P < 0.01). Compared to the baseline (rest), LnRMSSDsu, HRsu, RPE, and sleep quality were significantly different during the training, camp, and altitude training camp periods. Conversely, markers of standing Heart Rate Variability (HRV) did not differ during competition periods. Conclusion: Standing Heart Rate Variability, when combined with subjective markers, serves as a relevant monitoring tool for adapting training periods to regulate psychophysiological effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiron et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Healthy (Elite Athlete) (n=1). Vagal-mediated Heart Rate Variability (vmHRV) and subjective marker monitoring vs. Baseline (rest period) was evaluated on LnRMSSDsu (natural logarithm of the root mean square of successive differences during supine measurement) during training period compared to baseline (p=<0.001). Monitoring supine heart rate variability in an elite female athlete revealed significant decreases in parasympathetic activity during intense training compared to baseline, enabling optimized training prescription.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from International Journal of Disabilities Sports & Health Sciences