Key result
Spironolactone reduced systolic blood pressure and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity more profoundly than hydrochlorothiazide after 4 weeks in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Why the study?
Does spironolactone improve blood pressure control and arterial stiffness compared to hydrochlorothiazide in uncontrolled hypertensive patients on ACEI/ARB and CCB?
Observational (n=566)
Single-blind (outcome assessors blinded)
Quasi-randomized (odd/even telephone number)
No
Does spironolactone improve blood pressure control and arterial stiffness compared to hydrochlorothiazide in uncontrolled hypertensive patients on ACEI/ARB and CCB?
Absolute Event Rate: 130% vs 134%
p-value: p=<.05
In patients with uncontrolled hypertension on ACEI/ARB and CCB, adding spironolactone provided superior blood pressure reduction and arterial stiffness improvement compared to hydrochlorothiazide over 4 weeks.
Spironolactone may favor greater BP and stiffness reductions than HCTZ; observational data leaves open practice change pending RCTs.
The present study is to investigate whether spironolactone is better than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for blood pressure (BP) control and arterial stiffness improvement. Five-hundred-sixty-six uncontrolled hypertensive patients with 2 different classes of antihypertensive medications treatment were enrolled. Spironolactone or HCTZ was randomly prescribed for 4 weeks. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) was measured at baseline and after 4 weeks' of spironolactone or HCTZ treatment. Between-group differences were evaluated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of cf-PWV increase and incident resistant hypertension. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between spironolactone and HCTZ groups. After 4 weeks' treatment, both systolic BP and cf-PWV were reduced more profoundly in spironolactone group versus HCTZ group (P < .05). Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis showed that age, diabetes mellitus, and HCTZ were positively correlated with cf-PWV, while spironolactone was negatively with cf-PWV. Logistic regression analysis indicated that per 1-standard deviation increase in cf-PWV was associated with 92% higher incidence of resistant hypertension. After adjusted for spironolactone, no significant association between cf-PWV increase and incident resistant hypertension was observed, indicating that the adverse effect of arterial stiffness on resistant hypertension development might be reversed by spironolactone treatment. In summary, uncontrolled hypertensive patients with spironolactone treatment appear to have better BP control and arterial stiffness improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=566). Spironolactone vs. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/qd was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 4 weeks (p=<.05). Spironolactone reduced systolic blood pressure and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity more profoundly than hydrochlorothiazide after 4 weeks in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: