Key result
Sequential biventricular pacing with VV-optimization improved systolic heart function, increasing tissue tracking to 5.4 mm compared to 5.0 mm with simultaneous pacing in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Does sequential biventricular pacing (VV-optimization) acutely improve systolic heart function and dyssynchrony compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS?
Observational (n=21)
No
Does sequential biventricular pacing (VV-optimization) acutely improve systolic heart function and dyssynchrony compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS?
Sequential biventricular pacing (VV-optimization) acutely improves echocardiographic measures of systolic function and dyssynchrony more than simultaneous pacing in heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute systolic gains with VV-optimized sequential pacing should not yet change practice; leaves open whether benefits extend to clinical outcomes.
AIMS: Biventricular pacing (BiP) is an effective treatment in systolic heart failure (HF) patients with prolonged QRS. However, approximately 35% of the patients receiving BiP are classified as non-responders. The aim of this study is to evaluate the acute effects of VV-optimization on systolic heart function. METHODS: Twenty-one HF patients aged 72 (46-88) years, QRS 154 (120-190) ms, were studied with echocardiography, Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) and 3D-echo the first day after receiving a BiP device. TDI was performed; during simultaneous pacing (LV-lead pacing 4 ms before the RV-lead) and during sequential pacing (LV 20 and 40 ms before RV and RV 20 and 40 ms before LV-lead pacing). Systolic heart function was studied by tissue tracking (TT) for longitudinal function and systolic maximal velocity (SMV) for regional contractility and signs of dyssynchrony assessed by time-delays standard deviation of aortic valve opening to SMV, AVO-SMV/SD and tissue synchronization imaging (TSI). RESULTS: The TT mean value preoperatively was 4.2 +/- 1.5 and increased at simultaneous pacing to 5.0 +/- 1.2 mm (p < 0.05), and at best VV-interval to 5.4 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.001). Simultaneous pacing achieved better TT distance compared with preoperative in 16 patients (76%). However, it was still higher after VV-optimization in 12 patients 57%. Corresponding figures for SMV were 3.0 +/- 0.7, 3.5 +/- 0.8 (p < 0,01), and 3.6 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.001). Also dyssynchrony improved. CONCLUSIONS: VV-optimization in the acute phase improves systolic heart function more than simultaneous BiP pacing. Long-term effects should be evaluated in prospective randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edner et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Heart failure with prolonged QRS (n=21). Sequential biventricular pacing (VV-optimization) vs. Simultaneous biventricular pacing was evaluated on Longitudinal function measured by tissue tracking (TT) in mm (p=<0.001). Sequential biventricular pacing with VV-optimization improved systolic heart function, increasing tissue tracking to 5.4 mm compared to 5.0 mm with simultaneous pacing in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: