Key result
Simultaneous variation of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular pacing delay with biventricular pacing improved interventricular synchrony by 0.31 compared to default settings (p<0.001) in a pig model of acute left ventricular volume overload.
Why the study?
Does simultaneous variation of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular pacing delay with biventricular pacing improve hemodynamics in acute left ventricular failure?
Does simultaneous variation of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular pacing delay with biventricular pacing improve hemodynamics in acute left ventricular failure?
Effect estimate: -0.31 change from default
p-value: p=<0.001
Simultaneous optimization of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular delay during biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics in acute left ventricular failure by recruiting the unstressed ventricle.
Hypothesis-generating for biventricular pacing optimization in acute LV failure; leaves open clinical translation and hemodynamic effects in patients.
The goal of this work was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of simultaneous left ventricular (LV) pacing site (LVPS) and interventricular pacing delay (VVD) variation with biventricular pacing (BiVP) during acute LV failure. Simultaneously varying LVPS and VVD with BiVP has been shown to improve hemodynamics during acute right ventricular (RV) failure. However, effects during acute LV failure have not been reported. In six open-chest pigs, acute LV volume overload was induced by regurgitant flow via an aortic-LV conduit. Epicardial BiVP was implemented with right atrial and ventricular leads and a custom LV pacing array. Fifty-four LVPS-VVD combinations were tested in random order. Cardiac output was evaluated by aortic flow probe, ventricular systolic function by maximum rate of ventricular pressure change, and mechanical interventricular synchrony by normalized RV-LV pressure diagram area. Simultaneous LVPS-VVD variation improved all measures of cardiac function. The observed effect was different for each functional index, with evidence of LVPS-VVD interaction. Compared with effects of LVPS-VVD variation in a model of acute RV failure, hemodynamic changes were markedly different. However, in both models, maximum rate of ventricular pressure change of the failing ventricle was improved with synchronous interventricular contraction, suggesting that, in acute ventricular failure, BiVP can recruit the unstressed ventricle to support systolic function of the failing one. Thus simultaneously varying LVPS and VVD with BiVP during acute ventricular failure can improve cardiac function by "interventricular assist", with hemodynamic effects dependent on the type of failure. This supports the potential utility of temporary BiVP for the treatment of acute ventricular failure commonly seen after cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quinn et al. (2009) studied Acute left ventricular volume overload (n=6). Simultaneous variation of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular pacing delay with biventricular pacing vs. Default biventricular pacing settings (LVPS = circumflex; VVD = 0 ms) was evaluated on Interventricular synchrony (APP) (-0.31 change from default, p=<0.001). Simultaneous variation of left ventricular pacing site and interventricular pacing delay with biventricular pacing improved interventricular synchrony by 0.31 compared to default settings (p<0.001) in a pig model of acute left ventricular volume overload.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: