Key result
PVI prevents PAF and recurrent VT for 12 months in a hemodialysis patient with RCA CTO.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation can reduce VT recurrence in electrical storm, but identifying and treating triggers is essential when a ventricular substrate becomes arrhythmogenic only during high-rate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Does pulmonary vein isolation prevent recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and electrical storm triggered by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during hemodialysis?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does pulmonary vein isolation prevent recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and electrical storm triggered by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during hemodialysis?
Pulmonary vein isolation may serve as an effective tailored treatment for electrical storm in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy when ventricular arrhythmias are specifically triggered by rapid paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
May support PVI for AF-triggered VT in select hemodialysis patients; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
Background: Catheter ablation of the ventricular substrate can reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and mortality in an electrical storm (ES). However, identification and specific treatment of plausible triggers is mandatory and may lead to the resolution of ES. Objective: This case presentation seeks to exemplify how pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may represent a tailored treatment of ES in cases of ventricular substrate, which only becomes arrhythmogenic during high-rate episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Results: A 54-year-old male with a history of inferior myocardial infarction (MI) and long-term hemodialysis was referred for repetitive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks for apparently scar-related monomorphic VT episodes preceded by PAF initiation strictly during hemodialysis. He had recently undergone ICD implantation for similar episodes of ES preceded by the rapid-ventricular response (RVR) PAF during hemodialysis. The patient had no other history of VTs. Electrocardiogram (EKG) changes occurred exclusively during PAF and suggested functional myocardial ischemia. Coronary angiography demonstrated isolated right coronary artery (RCA) chronic total occlusion (CTO). Cardiac magnetic resonance demonstrated RCA-territory residual myocardial viability and mild LV systolic dysfunction. Surgical revascularization was not feasible due to a history of bilateral above-the-knee post-traumatic amputation and severe calcification of internal mammary (IMA) and radial arteries. Subsequent CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention attempt was unsuccessful. The difficulty of assessing LV-substrate ablation end-points due to the "functional" character of the substrate, which only became arrhythmogenic during hemodialysis-related PAF, was considered. Consequently, PVI was performed rather than VT/VF substrate ablation. Twelve months after PVI, the patient remains free of PAF and VT/VF despite chronic hemodialysis sessions. Conclusion: The ES episodes can be triggered by situational factors, such as RVR-PAF and functional ischemia, during hemodialysis in patients with CTO with otherwise no episodes of VT. Tailored treatment of such factors may lead to long-term VT freedom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cojocaru et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia (Electrical Storm) during hemodialysis (n=1). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency catheter ablation was evaluated on Freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Pulmonary vein isolation successfully prevented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and recurrent ventricular tachycardia over 12 months of follow-up in a hemodialysis patient with right coronary artery chronic total occlusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: