Key result
Whole-body heating, unlike local heating, acutely elevates serum BDNF levels by ~54% versus control.
Why the study?
While whole-body heating is known to elevate circulating BDNF concentration, the effects of local heating protocols remain unknown.
Does whole-body or local passive heating increase serum and plasma BDNF concentration in recreationally active males?
Does whole-body or local passive heating increase serum and plasma BDNF concentration in recreationally active males?
Absolute Event Rate: 25.9% vs 16.8%
p-value: p=<0.044
Whole-body heating, but not local passive heating, acutely elevates circulating BDNF concentration in recreationally active males.
Whole-body heating may elevate BDNF in active males; hypothesis-generating for neuroprotection but requires confirmation before any clinical use.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a key role in neuronal adaptations. While previous studies suggest that whole-body heating can elevate circulating BDNF concentration, this is not known for local heating protocols. This study investigated the acute effects of whole-body versus local passive heating on serum and plasma BDNF concentration. Using a water-perfused suit, ten recreationally active males underwent three 90 min experimental protocols: heating of the legs with upper-body cooling (LBH), whole-body heating (WBH) and a control condition (CON). Blood samples were collected before, immediately after and 1 h post-heating for the determination of serum and plasma BDNF concentration, platelet count as well as the BDNF release per platelet. Rectal temperature, cardiac output and femoral artery shear rate were assessed at regular intervals. Serum and plasma BDNF concentration were elevated after WBH (serum: 19.1±5.0 to 25.9±11.3 ng/ml, plasma: 2.74±0.9 to 4.58±2.0; p<0.044), but not LBH (serum: 19.1±4.7 to 22.3±4.8 ng/ml, plasma: 3.25±1.13 to 3.39±0.90 ng/ml; p>0.126), when compared with CON (serum: 18.6±6.4 to 16.8±3.4 ng/ml, plasma: 2.49±0.69 to 2.82±0.89 ng/ml); accompanied by an increase in platelet count (p<0.001). However, there was no change in BDNF content per platelet after either condition (p = 0.392). All physiological measures were elevated to a larger extent after WBH compared with LBH (p<0.001), while shear rate and rectal temperature were higher during LBH than CON (p<0.038). In conclusion, WBH but not LBH acutely elevates circulating BDNF concentration. While these findings further support the use of passive heating to elevate BDNF concentration, a larger increase in shear rate, sympathetic activity and/or rectal temperature than found after LBH appears needed to induce an acute BDNF response by passive heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogawa et al. (2021) studied Healthy (n=10). Whole-body heating (WBH) and local passive heating (LBH) vs. Control condition (CON) was evaluated on Serum BDNF concentration (p=<0.044). Whole-body heating, but not local passive heating, acutely elevated serum (to 25.9 ng/ml) and plasma (to 4.58 ng/ml) BDNF concentrations compared to control (p<0.044).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: