Key result
A clinical prediction rule identified low-risk AF patients taking aspirin who had a stroke/TIA rate of 1.1 per 100 person-years, comparable to the 1.2 rate in an age-matched community cohort.
Why the study?
Does a clinical prediction rule identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking aspirin who have a low risk of stroke comparable to the general population?
Population
2,501 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with aspirin during participation in 6 clinical…
Comparison
Clinical prediction rule identifying low-risk… vs Age- and sex-matched cohort from the Framingham…
Design
Cohort, Patients were randomly divided into derivation and validation sets
Follow-up
4688.6 person-years of observation (total)
Authors
Loading...
May support identifying low-risk AF patients on aspirin with population-comparable stroke rates; leaves open whether anticoagulation can be safely omitted pending randomized trials.
Cohort (n=2,501)
Yes
Does a clinical prediction rule identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking aspirin who have a low risk of stroke comparable to the general population?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.1% vs 1.2%
A simple clinical prediction rule based on the absence of four clinical features identifies patients with atrial fibrillation taking aspirin who have stroke rates comparable to the general population and may not require oral anticoagulation.
Walraven et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=2,501). Aspirin (in low-risk patients identified by prediction rule) vs. Age- and sex-matched cohort from the Framingham Heart Study was evaluated on stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or transient ischemic attack. A clinical prediction rule identified low-risk AF patients taking aspirin who had a stroke/TIA rate of 1.1 per 100 person-years, comparable to the 1.2 rate in an age-matched community cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: