Key result
Cystatin-C (optimal cutoff 1.7 mg/l) provided better incremental prognostic value for 2-year cardiac events (which occurred in 77 of 232 patients) compared to NT-proBNP and uric acid.
Why the study?
Does cystatin-C provide better prognostic value than uric acid and NT-proBNP for predicting cardiac events in patients with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=232)
Does cystatin-C provide better prognostic value than uric acid and NT-proBNP for predicting cardiac events in patients with acute heart failure?
Cystatin-C may serve as a superior prognostic biomarker compared to uric acid and NT-proBNP for predicting long-term cardiac events in patients presenting with acute heart failure.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of acute heart failure (HF) can be determined by cardio-renal function which is assessed by cystatin-C (Cys-C). We evaluated whether Cys-C could be a more useful prognostic indicator in acute HF, compared with uric acid (UA) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two HF patients in the emergency room were studied using measurements of Cys-C, UA, and NT-proBNP. During the follow-up, cardiac events, defined as the composites of recurrent HF or cardiac death, were determined. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cardiac events (28 cardiac deaths, 49 recurrent HFs) occurred over two years. The events group revealed higher levels of Cys-C, UA, and NT-proBNP. They showed increased blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, reduced septal tissue Doppler velocity (TVI-Sm), and low frequencies of beta-blockers (BB), diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/-receptor blockers. Cys-C (the best cutoff: 1.7 mg/l) had a steady, persistent hazard ratio (HR) over two years. On multivariate analysis, Cys-C, TVI-Sm, and BB were significant predictors for adverse events. Cys-C provided an incremental value for prognosis more than NT-proBNP and UA did over the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with UA and NT-proBNP, Cys-C could be better prognostic biomarker for cardiac events two years after acute HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=232). Cystatin-C (Cys-C) vs. Uric acid (UA) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was evaluated on Cardiac events (composite of recurrent heart failure or cardiac death). Cystatin-C (optimal cutoff 1.7 mg/l) provided better incremental prognostic value for 2-year cardiac events (which occurred in 77 of 232 patients) compared to NT-proBNP and uric acid.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: