Key result
Frailty after lung transplantation is linked to ~76% greater risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction.
Why the study?
Frailty and chronic lung allograft dysfunction commonly develop after lung transplantation and worsen outcomes, but their temporal relationship was unknown.
Does the development of physical frailty increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in adult lung transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=231)
Clinicians blinded to frailty assessments
No
Does the development of physical frailty increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in adult lung transplant recipients?
Effect estimate: cHR 1.76 (95% CI 1.05-2.92)
p-value: p=0.031
The development of physical frailty after lung transplantation is significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent chronic lung allograft dysfunction, suggesting frailty may be an early clinical marker of graft dysfunction.
Frailty may flag higher CLAD risk after lung transplant; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before changing practice.
BACKGROUND: After lung transplantation, both frailty and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) commonly develop, and when they do, are associated with poorer outcomes. Given their potential shared mechanisms, we sought to explore the temporal relationship between frailty and CLAD onset. METHODS: In a single center, we prospectively measured frailty by the short physical performance battery (SPPB) repeatedly after transplant. Because of the nature of the relationship between frailty and CLAD is unknown, we tested the association between frailty, modeled as a time-dependent predictor, and CLAD development as well as CLAD development, modeled as a time-dependent predictor, and frailty development. To do so, we used Cox proportional cause-specific hazards and conditional logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, diagnosis, cytomegalovirus serostatus, posttransplant body mass index, and acute cellular rejection episodes as time-dependent covariates. We tested SPPB frailty as a binary (≤9 points) and continuous predictor (12-point scale); as an outcome, we defined frailty as SPPB ≤9. RESULTS: The 231 participants were a mean age of 55.7 y (SD 12.1). After adjusting for covariates, the development of frailty within 3 y after lung transplant was associated with cause-specific CLAD risk (adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.92 when defining frailty as SPPB ≤9 and adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% CI, 1.03-1.18 per 1-point worsening in SPPB). CLAD onset did not appear to be a risk factor for subsequent frailty (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 0.4-197.0). CONCLUSIONS: Studying the mechanisms underlying frailty and CLAD could provide new insights into the pathobiology of both and potential targets for intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singer et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Lung transplantation (n=231). Frailty (SPPB score ≤ 9) vs. Not frail was evaluated on Development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) (cHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05-2.92, p=0.031). The development of frailty within 3 years after lung transplantation was associated with a 75% increased risk of subsequent chronic lung allograft dysfunction (cHR 1.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: