Key result
Active stand testing links age, IOH, and BMI to distinct neurocardiovascular responses in older women.
Why the study?
This study investigated neurocardiovascular responses to an active stand test using continuous physiological monitoring and functional data analysis in older women.
Does functional data analysis of an active stand test detect differences in neurocardiovascular responses among older women based on clinical characteristics?
Observational (n=25)
Does functional data analysis of an active stand test detect differences in neurocardiovascular responses among older women based on clinical characteristics?
Functional data analysis of continuous physiological monitoring during an active stand test can detect subtle, time-dependent neurocardiovascular variations in older women based on age, orthostatic hypotension, and BMI.
Hypothesis-generating for neurocardiovascular phenotyping via active stand testing; prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
This observational pilot study investigated neurocardiovascular responses to an active stand test using continuous physiological monitoring and functional data analysis (FDA) in older women. A sample of 25 community-dwelling female adults aged 59–78 years (mean age: 70.3 years) participated. Participants were dichotomized into comparison groups based on five factors: age (<70 vs. ≥70 years); the presence of initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH, yes/no); body mass index (BMI < 25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2); antihypertensive medication use (yes/no); and physical frailty status assessed by the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe—Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI score < −0.5 vs. ≥−0.5). Each participant completed an active stand test during which six physiological signals were continuously recorded: systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure and heart rate (HR) via digital artery photoplethysmography and left frontal oxygenated hemoglobin (O2Hb), deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb), and tissue saturation index (TSI) via near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The signal analysis focused on a standardized 200 s window spanning 50 s before to 150 s after the stand, with all signals resampled and synchronized at 5 Hz. FDA was used to statistically compare the full time series between groups for each signal. Group-level differences revealed that younger participants (<70 years) exhibited significantly higher HR in multiple periods following the stand (~10 s, ~30 s, ~90 s, and ~140 s post-stand) compared to their older counterparts. Participants with IOH demonstrated significantly lower sBP at ~10 s, ~80 s, and ~130 s post-stand and lower dBP at ~10 s post-stand. Among participants classified as overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), significantly lower levels of HHb were observed at ~10 s, ~30–50 s, and ~60 s post-stand, while O2Hb levels were reduced at ~50 s, ~60 s, ~70–110 s, ~130 s, and ~140 s post-stand. No statistically significant group-level differences were observed based on antihypertensive medication use or frailty status. These findings demonstrate the utility of FDA in detecting subtle, time-dependent physiological variations during orthostatic challenge and underscore the value of continuous neurocardiovascular monitoring in assessing orthostatic tolerance in aging populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Orthostatic tolerance (n=25). Active stand test vs. Internal comparison groups (age, IOH, BMI, medication, frailty) was evaluated on Neurocardiovascular responses (sBP, dBP, HR, O2Hb, HHb, TSI) during an active stand test. Functional data analysis of an active stand test in older women identified significant time-dependent differences in heart rate by age, blood pressure by IOH status, and hemoglobin levels by BMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: