Key result
Facial video-based photoplethysmography demonstrated acceptable agreement with a Polar system for analyzing heart rate variability during a 5-minute rest test, performing better in the supine position.
Why the study?
Does non-contact facial video-based photoplethysmography accurately measure HRV at rest compared to a Polar system in individuals?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
Does non-contact facial video-based photoplethysmography accurately measure HRV at rest compared to a Polar system in individuals?
Facial video-based photoplethysmography is a feasible non-contact method for analyzing heart rate variability at rest, with better performance in the supine compared to the sitting position.
May support non-contact HRV monitoring at rest; leaves open prospective validation in clinical and dynamic settings.
Our aim is to demonstrate the usefulness of photoplethysmography (PPG) for analyzing heart rate variability (HRV) using a standard 5-min test at rest with paced breathing, comparing the results with real RR intervals and testing supine and sitting positions. Simultaneous recordings of R-R intervals were conducted with a Polar system and a non-contact PPG, based on facial video recording on 20 individuals. Data analysis and editing were performed with individually designated software for each instrument. Agreement on HRV parameters was assessed with concordance correlations, effect size from ANOVA and Bland and Altman plots. For supine position, differences between video and Polar systems showed a small effect size in most HRV parameters. For sitting position, these differences showed a moderate effect size in most HRV parameters. A new procedure, based on the pixels that contained more heart beat information, is proposed for improving the signal-to-noise ratio in the PPG video signal. Results were acceptable in both positions but better in the supine position. Our approach could be relevant for applications that require monitoring of stress or cardio-respiratory health, such as effort/recuperation states in sports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (2015) reported a cross-sectional. Facial video-based photoplethysmography (PPG) vs. Polar system was evaluated on Agreement on HRV parameters. Facial video-based photoplethysmography demonstrated acceptable agreement with a Polar system for analyzing heart rate variability during a 5-minute rest test, performing better in the supine position.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: