Key result
Working age links to ~16% more home-time after first HF hospitalization versus retirement age.
Why the study?
This study was performed to compare trends in home-time for patients with heart failure between those of working age and those of retirement age in Sweden from 1992 to 2012.
Does home-time after a first diagnosis of heart failure differ between patients of working age and retirement age?
Observational (n=388,775)
Yes
Does home-time after a first diagnosis of heart failure differ between patients of working age and retirement age?
Absolute Event Rate: 83.8% vs 68.2%
Home-time after a first heart failure hospitalization has increased over 20 years in Sweden, though this improvement stalled for women of retirement age after 2007 due to a lack of mortality reduction.
Lower home-time in retirement-age HF patients, especially women, warrants age-targeted support; leaves open whether interventions can close sex-specific gaps.
AIMS: This study was performed to compare trends in home-time for patients with heart failure (HF) between those of working age and those of retirement age in Sweden from 1992 to 2012. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Register (IPR) was used to identify all patients aged 18 to 84 years with a first hospitalization for HF in Sweden from 1992 to 2012. Information on date of death, comorbidities, and sociodemographic factors were collected from the Swedish National Register on Cause of Death, the IPR, and the longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies, respectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: working age (<65 years) and retirement age (≥65 years). Follow-up was 4 years. In total, following exclusions, 388 775 patients aged 18 to 84 years who were alive 1 day after discharge from a first hospitalization for HF were included in the study. The working age group comprised 62 428 (16%) patients with a median age of 58 (interquartile range, 53-62) years and 31.2% women, and the retirement age group comprised 326 347 (84%) patients with a median age of 77 (interquartile range, 73-81) years and 47.4% women. Patients of working age had more home-time than patients of retirement age (83.8% vs. 68.2%, respectively), mainly because of their lower 4 year mortality rate (14.2% vs. 29.7%, respectively). Home-time increased over the study period for both age groups, but the increase levelled off for older women after 2007, most likely because of less reduction in mortality in older women than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study showed increasing home-time over the study period except for women of retirement age and older for whom the increase stalled after 2007, mainly because of a lower mortality reduction in this group. Efforts to improve patient-related outcome measures specifically targeted to this group may be warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekestubbe et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=388,775). Working age (<65 years) vs. Retirement age (≥65 years) was evaluated on Home-time (percentage of time spent alive and out of the hospital).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: