This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Despite advances in digital technology, summative assessment in the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) Dance syllabus remain shaped by historical structures and practices. This study explores how digital technologies might better support fair, valid, and reliable assessment in senior secondary dance education. Through semi-structured interviews with six Australian experts in ATAR Dance curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment, the research highlights a shared interest in using technology to enhance learning and address assessment challenges. Participants acknowledged constraints imposed by traditional models but expressed openness to explore new possibilities and adapt to the current climate. The findings suggest that digital tools could foster a shared understanding among students, teachers, and examiners, improve pedagogical and reflective practices, and provide ongoing records of achievement. The article concludes by offering insights to inform standards, moderation, and professional development, supporting a more equitable and future-focused approach to dance assessment, in support of dance as an art form.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gamble et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: