Key result
Carreau, Casson, and generalized power-law models outperform alternatives for solving blood flow at all shear rates.
Why the study?
Numerical simulation of hemodynamics aids in early prediction and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, but identifying the best rheological models to effectively simulate blood flow across different blood vessels remained necessary.
Comparison
Different rheological models for simulating hemodynamics across different classes of blood vessels
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Prioritizes refined rheological models for hemodynamic simulations; leaves open validation in patient-specific cardiovascular applications.
Carreau, Casson, and generalized power-law models are superior for simulating blood flow hemodynamics across all shear rates compared to other common models.
Kannojiya et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Rheological models (Carreau, Casson, generalized power-law) vs. Other models (power law, Walburn-Scheck, Herchel-Bulkley) was evaluated on Performance capability of different rheological models for solving blood flow. The Carreau, Casson, and generalized power-law models were superior for solving blood flow at all shear rates compared to power law, Walburn-Scheck, and Herchel-Bulkley models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: