Key result
Sixteen blood rheological models were partitioned into three homogeneous groups and three outliers based on hemodynamic variables from numerical simulations on an idealized symmetrical bifurcation.
Why the study?
Alternative blood rheological specifications have been used in numerical blood flow simulations, but their implications for hemodynamic characteristics remain uncertain.
Different mathematical formulations of blood rheological models can produce similar hemodynamic data and be used interchangeably, while mathematically similar models may behave differently.
Rheological model selection in hemodynamic simulations warrants caution; animal data leave open clinical equivalence of grouped formulations.
The assumed rheological behavior of blood influences the hemodynamic characteristics of numerical blood flow simulations. Until now, alternative rheological specifications have been utilized, with uncertain implications for the results obtained. This work aims to group sixteen blood rheological models in homogeneous clusters, by exploiting data generated from numerical simulations on an idealized symmetrical arterial bifurcation. Blood flow is assumed to be pulsatile and is simulated using a commercial finite volume solver. An appropriate mesh convergence study is performed, and all results are collected at three different time instants throughout the cardiac cycle: at peak systole, early diastole, and late diastole. Six hemodynamic variables are computed: the time average wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, relative residence time, global and local non-Newtonian importance factor, and non-Newtonian effect factor. The resulting data are analyzed using hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithms, which constitute typical unsupervised classification methods. Interestingly, the rheological models can be partitioned into three homogeneous groups, whereas three specifications appear as outliers which do not belong in any partition. Our findings suggest that models which are defined in a similar manner from a mathematical perspective may behave substantially differently in terms of the data they produce. On the other hand, models characterized by different mathematical formulations may belong to the same statistical group (cluster) and can thus be considered interchangeably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzirakis et al. (2023) studied Blood flow simulation. Blood rheological models was evaluated on Hemodynamic variables (time average wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, relative residence time, global and local non-Newtonian importance factor, and non-Newtonian effect factor). Sixteen blood rheological models were partitioned into three homogeneous groups and three outliers based on hemodynamic variables from numerical simulations on an idealized symmetrical bifurcation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: