Key result
Invasive therapy linked to up to ~57% lower long-term mortality versus no invasive therapy across all ages.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the age-specific association between invasive treatment at acute myocardial infarction and long-term all-cause mortality.
Does invasive treatment (PCI or CABG) reduce long-term all-cause mortality in hospitalized AMI patients across different age groups?
Cohort (n=4,964)
Does invasive treatment (PCI or CABG) reduce long-term all-cause mortality in hospitalized AMI patients across different age groups?
Effect estimate: HR 0.55 (PCI), HR 0.43 (CABG) (95% CI 0.44-0.70 (PCI), 0.30-0.62 (CABG))
Invasive treatment (PCI or CABG) for acute myocardial infarction is associated with significantly reduced long-term all-cause mortality across all age groups, including older adults aged 75-84 years.
May support invasive therapy in older AMI patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of causality.
Background: To investigate the age-specific association between invasive treatment, that is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause long-term mortality. Methods: The analysis was based on 4964 hospitalized AMI patients (age 25-84 years) registered by the population-based Augsburg Myocardial Infarction Registry between 2010 and 2017. The median follow-up time was 4.7 years (IQR: 2.7; 6.8). All-cause mortality was obtained by regularly checking the vital status of all registered AMI patients in cooperation with the regional population registries. In multivariable adjusted Cox regression analyses the age-specific associations between invasive therapy (PCI or CABG versus no invasive therapy) and all-cause mortality were investigated. Results: During follow-up 1224 patients (805 men and 419 women) died. In patients younger than 55 years 7.6 %, in the age group 55-64 years 7.1 %, in the age group 65-74 years 12.2 %, and in the age group 75-84 years 21.6 % did not undergo invasive therapy (PCI or CABG) during hospital stay. Invasive therapy using PCI or CABG significantly reduced mortality risk in all age-groups in comparison to AMI patients without invasive treatment. Even 75-84 years old benefited very impressively from invasive therapy regarding long-term all-cause mortality (PCI: HR 0.55; 95 % CI 0.44-0.70; CABG: HR 0.43; 95 % CI 0.30-0.62). Conclusions: Invasive or surgical therapy procedures in the treatment of AMI patients are effective in all age groups. Therefore, also old AMI patients should receive guideline-compliant therapy to achieve a better outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraus et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=4,964). Invasive treatment (PCI or CABG) vs. No invasive therapy was evaluated on All-cause long-term mortality (HR 0.55 (PCI), HR 0.43 (CABG), 95% CI 0.44-0.70 (PCI), 0.30-0.62 (CABG)). Invasive therapy (PCI or CABG) significantly reduced long-term all-cause mortality versus no invasive therapy across all age groups, including those aged 75-84 years (PCI: HR 0.55; CABG: HR 0.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: