Key result
Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty during mitral valve replacement is not linked to increased in-hospital mortality.
Why the study?
Mitral valve abnormalities in rheumatic heart disease commonly lead to functional tricuspid regurgitation, prompting comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality between MVR with tricuspid annuloplasty versus isolated MVR.
Does concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty increase perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement?
Cohort (n=158)
No
Does concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty increase perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement?
Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty during mitral valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease is safe and does not increase in-hospital mortality or early postoperative complications.
Should not yet change practice in rheumatic mitral surgery; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of perioperative safety.
Introduction Mitral valve abnormalities in rheumatic heart disease commonly lead to functional tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) is often performed in these cases along with mitral valve replacement (MVR). Our aim was to compare the perioperative morbidity and mortality among those patients that underwent mitral valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty versus those that underwent isolated mitral valve replacement. Methods A retrospective analysis of 158 patients that underwent mitral valve replacement, with or without tricuspid annuloplasty, secondary to rheumatic heart disease between January 2017 and August 2020. Patients who underwent additional cardiothoracic surgical procedures (aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting) were excluded to reduce confounders. Results The study group consisted of 158 patients (mean age 41; 73 male, 85 female) that underwent MVR with TA (n=22; 13.9%) or without TA (n=136; 86.1%). Both groups had similar comorbidity frequencies and medication history. Preoperative echocardiography showed a comparable degree of pulmonary hypertension and ejection fraction between the two groups. The TA+MVR group had similar intraoperative (81.8% vs 66.9%; p=0.161) and postoperative (45.5% vs 45.6%; p=0.991) blood products usage compared to the MVR only group. Concurrent TA resulted in similar in-hospital mortality (4.5% vs 4.4%; p=0.977) as well as early postoperative complications, namely, prolonged ICU stay (13.6% vs 10.3%; p=0.639), prolonged ventilation (0 vs 2.2%; p=0.482), re-intubation (9.1% vs 2.9%; p= 0.161), and reopening for bleeding tamponade (0 vs 5.1%; p=0.276). Conclusions TA concurrently with MVR does not appear to increase in-hospital mortality or early postoperative complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farooq et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Rheumatic heart disease (n=158). Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty with mitral valve replacement vs. Isolated mitral valve replacement was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.977). Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty during mitral valve replacement did not significantly increase in-hospital mortality (4.5% vs 4.4%, p=0.977) compared to isolated mitral valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: