Key result
Survey reveals significant practice heterogeneity in peri-cardioversion anticoagulation for low-risk AF under 48 hours.
Why the study?
Data supporting the safety of cardioversion without anticoagulation in patients with AF duration <48 h are scarce, and 2020 ESC guidelines are based mainly on consensus.
What is the current clinical practice regarding anticoagulation management in low stroke risk patients undergoing cardioversion for atrial fibrillation <48 h duration?
Cross-Sectional (n=136)
Yes
What is the current clinical practice regarding anticoagulation management in low stroke risk patients undergoing cardioversion for atrial fibrillation <48 h duration?
There is significant heterogeneity in clinical practice regarding periprocedural anticoagulation for cardioversion of short-duration AF in low-risk patients, highlighting the need for definitive research.
Marked variation in low-risk short-duration AF cardioversion anticoagulation warrants caution; leaves open need for prospective trials to standardize care.
Data supporting the safety of cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) without anticoagulation in patients with AF duration <48 h are scarce. Observational studies suggest that the risk of stroke in these patients is very low when the definite duration of the AF episode is of <48 h and the clinical risk profile as estimated through the CHA2DS2VASc score is low (a score of 0 for men and 1 for women). As the recent 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines indication for this clinical scenario is based mainly on consensus, we sent out a survey to assess the current clinical practice on anticoagulation prior to and post-CV in patients with AF <24-48 h duration and low stroke risk across centres in Europe. Of the 136 respondents, half were affiliated to university hospitals (68/136; 50%). Non-university hospitals (50/136; 36%) and private hospitals (2/136; 1.4%) accounted over a third of respondents. The main findings of our survey were (i) heterogeneity in the anticoagulation management both before and post-CV in low stroke-risk patients with AF <48 h, (ii) higher utilization of periprocedural low-molecular-weight heparin than of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, (iii) higher utilization of pre-CV transoesophageal echocardiography for electrical CV than for pharmacological CV regardless of the duration of AF, (iv) high adherence to a 4-week post-CV oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, mainly for electrical CV, and finally, (v) perceived higher acceptance of lack of post-CV OAC therapy in patients with <24 h than 24-48 h episode duration. The results obtained in this survey highlight the need for more research providing definitive clarification on the safety of CV without anticoagulation in patients with short duration AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Migliore et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation <48 h duration (n=136). Survey on anticoagulation practice was evaluated on Current clinical practice on anticoagulation prior to and post-cardioversion. A survey of 136 respondents revealed significant heterogeneity in anticoagulation management before and after cardioversion in low stroke-risk patients with atrial fibrillation <48 hours duration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: