Key result
In a European registry of 1101 AF patients undergoing elective cardioversion, NOAC use increased significantly (driven by apixaban, P<0.001) while VKA use decreased (P=0.033) over a 1-year period.
Why the study?
What are the temporal and geographic trends in oral anticoagulation strategies for patients undergoing elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=1,101)
Yes
What are the temporal and geographic trends in oral anticoagulation strategies for patients undergoing elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.5% vs 68.5%
In a European registry of elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, there was a significant shift from VKA to NOAC usage over a 1-year period, though significant regional variations persist.
Indicates rising NOAC preference for cardioversion; leaves open regional outcome differences and practice implications.
Aims: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) pharmacological or electrical cardioversion may be performed to restore sinus rhythm. The procedure is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, which can be significantly reduced by adequate anticoagulation (OAC). Our aim was to create a partly prospective, partly retrospective cardioversion registry, particularly focusing on OAC strategies in different European countries, and on emerging choice of OAC over time. Methods: From September 2014 to October 2015, cardioversions due to AF performed in six European city hospitals in five European countries (Hungary: Budapest-1 and -2; Italy: Bari and Pisa; France: Amiens; Spain: Madrid; and Lithuania: Kaunas) were recorded in the registry. Results: A total of 1101 patients (retrospective/prospective: 679/422, male/female: 742/359, mean age: 67.3 years ± 11.2) were registered. Most of the cardioversions were electrical (97%). Oral anticoagulants were administered in 87% of the patient, the usage of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was 31.5% vs 68.5%, respectively. Seventy seven percent of the patients were given oral anticoagulants more than 3 weeks prior to the procedure, and 86% more than 4 weeks after the procedure. When using VKA, international normalized ratio (INR) at cardioversion was above 2.0 in 76% of the cases. A decline in VKA usage (P = 0.033) in elective cardioversion over approximately 1 year was observed. During the observation period, there was an increase in apixaban (P < 0.001), a slight increase in rivaroxaban (P = 0.028) and no changes in dabigatran (P = 0.34) usage for elective cardioversion. There were differences in use of OAC between the countries: Spain used most VKA (89%), while France used least VKA (39%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: According to current AF guidelines, NOACs are adequate alternatives to VKA for thromboembolic prevention in AF patients undergoing elective cardioversion. Our results indicate that NOAC use is increasing and there is a significant decrease in VKA use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papp et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion (n=1,101). Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on Usage of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). In a European registry of 1101 AF patients undergoing elective cardioversion, NOAC use increased significantly (driven by apixaban, P<0.001) while VKA use decreased (P=0.033) over a 1-year period.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: