Key result
NOACs are as safe and effective as warfarin for preventing thromboembolism around the time of cardioversion and are associated with shorter times to cardioversion.
Why the study?
Do NOACs reduce time to elective cardioversion and prevent thromboembolism compared to Warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do NOACs reduce time to elective cardioversion and prevent thromboembolism compared to Warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
NOACs appear safe and effective for peri-cardioversion anticoagulation and may facilitate shorter times to elective cardioversion compared to warfarin.
May support earlier cardioversion with NOACs in AF; leaves open confirmation by prospective trials.
Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is a procedure that has been commonly performed for over half a century. There is known to be an elevated risk of thromboembolism around the time of cardioversion, which has been shown to be drastically reduced with oral anticoagulation. The consistency of therapeutic anticoagulation in the weeks leading up to elective cardioversion is an important factor in the safety of the procedure. Until recently, the only option for oral anti-coagulation was Warfarin. The challenges of dosing Warfarin to achieve a therapeutic INR are well documented. In recent years, novel oral anticoagulant medications have been developed, which are thought to provide a consistent intensity of anticoagulation and do not require routine monitoring or dose adjustment. The purpose of this review is to examine the literature pertaining to a comparison of Warfarin versus novel oral anti-coagulants with respect to time of elective cardioversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krothapalli et al. (2016) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. NOACs (Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Thromboembolic events and time to cardioversion. NOACs are as safe and effective as warfarin for preventing thromboembolism around the time of cardioversion and are associated with shorter times to cardioversion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: